Best Practices for Estimating Development Time (With Real Data)

Software estimation is famously broken. Projects run late. Budgets overrun. Stakeholders get frustrated. But it doesn't have to be this way.

Why Estimates Are Wrong (It's Not Bad Math)

The problem with software estimates isn't mathematical - it's informational. We estimate poorly because:

The Planning Fallacy Humans systematically underestimate task duration while overestimating their ability to execute. This bias is well-documented in psychology and especially pronounced in creative work like coding.

Unknown Unknowns The tasks we can list and estimate rarely capture all the work. Integration bugs, unclear requirements, unexpected dependencies, code review cycles - the list of hidden work is endless.

Optimism Bias We estimate for the "best case" scenario where nothing goes wrong, even though something always goes wrong.

Lack of Historical Data Without data on how long similar tasks actually took, every estimate is essentially a guess.

The Fix: Build a Time Database

The single highest-leverage improvement to software estimation is tracking actual time on similar past tasks.

When you know: - Feature X of similar scope took 8 hours last time - Integration work adds ~30% to estimates - Bug fixing takes 2 hours per story point on average

...your estimates become data-driven projections, not optimistic guesses.

Reference Class Forecasting for Developers

This technique, used in large infrastructure projects, applies directly to software:

• Step 1: Identify the "class" of work (e.g., "REST API endpoint with auth")
• Step 2: Find historical examples of this class from your tracked time
• Step 3: Estimate based on the historical distribution, not best-case

Example: Your last three authentication features took 6h, 9h, and 7h respectively. A new auth feature probably takes 7-8 hours, not the 4 hours you'd optimistically guess.

Setting Up Your Time-Data Estimation System

Phase 1: Track Everything (Weeks 1-4) Start tracking all development time with Lync. Don't change how you work yet - just get baseline data.

Phase 2: Categorize Your Work (Weeks 4-8) Name projects consistently so Lync's breakdown is meaningful: - **client-name-feature-name** - **product-backend-auth** - **product-frontend-dashboard**

Phase 3: Build Your Reference Library (Ongoing) After completing features, note: "This took X hours and was approximately Y complexity." Over time, you build a personal estimation database.

The 80/20 Rule of Estimation Accuracy

Applying just these two improvements captures 80% of estimation accuracy gains:

Improvement 1: Add a 1.5x buffer Whatever your initial estimate, multiply by 1.5. This accounts for the planning fallacy and unknown unknowns. Sounds uncomfortable - but it's accurate.

Improvement 2: Check historical data Did you track something similar? What did it actually take? Use that number as your anchor.

Common Estimation Scenarios

"How long will this API endpoint take?" Look at: similar endpoints you've built. Typical range: 2-8 hours depending on complexity. Data gives you the specific range for your context.

"How long will the refactor take?" Refactors are notoriously underestimated. Track past refactors to build intuition. They almost always take 2-3x longer than expected.

"How long for a new feature end-to-end?" Break into components: design, backend, frontend, testing, review. Estimate each component using historical data for similar components.

Communicating Estimates with Confidence

When presenting estimates backed by data:

"Based on the last three similar features, which took 6-9 hours each, I estimate this will take 7-8 hours. I've included time for code review and testing."

This is dramatically more credible than "I think about a day, maybe two."

Start Building Your Estimation History

Every day you don't track is a day of estimation data lost forever. Start now, and in 3 months you'll have a reference library for better estimation.

Free. Automatic. Works in the background.

Start Tracking Free →